Sacred Acoustic Design: Integrating Architecture, Acoustics & Ritual Experience
When architects and project committees discuss a new church, mosque, or temple, the conversation often begins with form, symbolism, materials, capacity, circulation, and visual identity. Acoustic questions may appear later, frequently when an audio vendor is asked to propose a sound system.
That sequence can solve amplification requirements, but it may leave a more fundamental question unanswered:
How should this space sound in relation to its worship tradition, ritual practices, congregation, architecture, and cultural context?
A worship space is not acoustically neutral. Its sound influences whether spoken words can be followed, whether collective singing feels unified, whether recitation remains intelligible, whether ritual instruments retain their character, and whether silence can be experienced without intrusive noise. These conditions can affect participation, attention, comfort, memory, and the perceived identity of a place.
Sacred Acoustic Design is an evidence-informed framework developed by ALTA Integra for integrating building acoustics, architectural acoustics, electroacoustics, psychoacoustics, and ritual-use analysis in worship environments. It begins with the premise that an acoustic brief should respond not only to technical performance requirements, but also to the worship tradition, ritual sequence, congregation behavior, cultural context, accessibility needs, and intended character of the space.
The framework does not assume that spiritual experience can be engineered or guaranteed. Its purpose is to create acoustic conditions that support communication, participation, music, prayer, contemplation, and the community’s own understanding of sacred-space identity.
This article focuses on selected Christian church, Islamic mosque, and Buddhist temple or meditation contexts. These categories contain considerable diversity; they should not be treated as universal descriptions of all Christian, Islamic, Buddhist, or other religious traditions. Every project requires direct engagement with the people who understand and use its rituals.
Why Worship Spaces Need Different Acoustic Briefs
There is no single acoustic target that defines a successful worship space.
A cathedral may need to support spoken liturgy, choir, pipe organ, congregational responses, and periods of silence within the same volume. A contemporary church may combine sermons, amplified bands, multimedia, livestreaming, and collective singing. A mosque may need to support Quranic recitation, congregational prayer, the Friday sermon, teaching, and distributed speech reinforcement. A Buddhist teaching hall may alternate among spoken instruction, chanting, bells, ritual percussion, and meditation.
Each activity places different demands on the acoustic environment. Reverberation may support musical continuity and collective resonance, yet excessive late sound can reduce speech intelligibility. Strong amplification may improve audibility, yet poor loudspeaker placement or overlapping coverage can create interference and visual intrusion. A quiet room may support contemplation, yet an acoustically over-damped room can weaken chanting or collective participation.
Research in churches illustrates this complexity. Measurements and listener evaluations in 36 Portuguese Catholic churches found relationships among architectural features, objective room-acoustic parameters, and perceived attributes such as reverberance, clarity, intimacy, envelopment, and echoes. The results also showed why one metric cannot represent the entire listening experience [Carvalho, Morgado, and Henrique, 1997]. A separate study using measured binaural responses from Italian churches found that preferred listening conditions changed with musical material: conditions preferred for choral music were not identical to those preferred for instrumental music [Martellotta, 2008].
Mosque acoustics are equally dependent on condition and use. A field investigation of 21 mosques in Saudi Arabia measured reverberation, clarity, background noise, and speech transmission with and without operating building systems and sound reinforcement. It found significant acoustic deficiencies in unoccupied conditions and materially different performance when the mosques were occupied [Abdou, 2003]. This is an important reminder that geometry, finishes, congregation, services noise, and sound reinforcement must be considered together.
Buddhist worship environments also resist generalization. Measurements and simulations of the Deekshabhoomi Buddhist monument in Nagpur found a major difference between occupied and unoccupied reverberation and examined how this related to chanting, sermons, and meditation in that particular structure [Manohare, Dongre, and Wahurwagh, 2017]. Those results describe a specific building and ritual context; they are not a universal target for Buddhist temples.
The practical conclusion is straightforward: acoustic criteria must be developed from the building’s actual program, not selected from its religious label alone.
Figure 1. A conceptual pathway showing how physical acoustic conditions are perceived and interpreted, how they may support ritual participation, and how they can contribute to—without guaranteeing—meaning, belonging, and spiritual experience.
What Shapes a Sacred Acoustic Identity?
An effective acoustic brief begins with an understanding of how architecture, people, ritual, and technology interact.
Architecture, geometry, and materials
Room volume, proportions, ceiling form, balconies, columns, domes, alcoves, surface geometry, and material assemblies influence how sound is reflected, absorbed, scattered, focused, and transmitted. Their effects arise before any loudspeaker or acoustic treatment is installed.
Large reflective volumes may create long decay and spatial envelopment, but they can also produce echoes or poor speech clarity. Domes and concave surfaces may generate focusing under some conditions. Seating, carpets, curtains, doors, openings, ornamentation, and congregation occupancy may materially change the response. The relevant question is therefore not whether a material is generally “acoustic,” but how the complete assembly, area, location, geometry, and occupancy contribute to the intended result.
Worship tradition and ritual sequence
The acoustic requirements of a space change throughout a service or ceremony. A design team should map who speaks, sings, chants, plays, listens, or moves; where each source and listener is located; and how the sequence changes over time.
In a church, the source may move among altar, lectern, pulpit, choir, organ, musicians, and congregation. Measurements in Japanese churches have demonstrated that source location and direction can affect room-acoustic parameters and speech intelligibility, reinforcing the need to study the actual liturgical arrangement rather than a generic source position [Soeta et al., 2012].
The same principle applies in mosques, where the locations and functions of the imam, khatib, reciter, congregation, and loudspeaker system may vary. Parametric research on contemporary mosque configurations has shown how geometry, surface area, volume, and finishes affect predicted acoustic performance [Ismail, 2013]. In temples and meditation environments, teaching, chanting, bells, ritual percussion, procession, and silence may each require a different balance of audibility, decay, intimacy, and environmental control.
Within the Sacred Acoustic Design framework, Ritual Acoustics refers to this analysis of sound sources, listeners, movement, participation, timing, and spatial use throughout a worship sequence. It is a project-analysis layer rather than a claim that spiritual meaning can be reduced to acoustic physics.
Cultural memory and meaningful sound
Religious communities often recognize particular sounds as part of the identity of a place: bells, hymns, organ music, the Adhan, Quranic recitation, chanting, gongs, ritual drums, water, wind, birds, or collective responses. The appropriate design question is not simply how to suppress sound, but which sounds should be protected, supported, moderated, or excluded.
Soundscape research emphasizes that sound is experienced in context. ISO 12913-1 defines soundscape through human perception of the acoustic environment in context, making activity, place, expectation, and interpretation relevant to assessment [ISO 12913-1:2014]. A study using social surveys and soundwalks at Myeong-dong Cathedral and Bongeun Buddhist Temple in Seoul also found that soundscape and spatial context contributed differently to how tranquility and religious-space functions were perceived at the two sites [Jeon, Hwang, and Hong, 2014].
These findings do not allow a consultant to define sacredness on behalf of a community. They support a participatory process in which clergy, ritual leaders, musicians, worshippers, architects, operators, and accessibility representatives help define which acoustic qualities matter.
Congregation, inclusion, and accessibility
People do not experience the same room in the same way. Age, hearing ability, language, familiarity with the ritual, seating position, and assistive technology can affect whether speech and music are accessible.
An inclusive brief should consider:
- Speech intelligibility across representative seating locations
- Assistive-listening requirements
- Multilingual interpretation or translation
- Audibility for elderly worshippers and people with hearing loss
- Visual integration of loudspeakers and user devices
- Appropriate sound levels without unnecessary exposure
- Clear emergency and operational communication
- Broadcast and livestream requirements that may differ from the in-room experience
### Technology and environmental context
Electroacoustic systems should be coordinated with the architecture and room response. Their purpose is not merely to increase level, but to provide appropriate coverage, intelligibility, tonal balance, timing, and reliability while respecting sightlines, heritage, ritual focus, and visual character.
Open or semi-open worship spaces introduce another layer. Wind, water, traffic, aircraft, nearby activity, and building services may contribute either valued context or unwanted masking. Natural sound should not automatically be romanticized, just as environmental sound should not automatically be eliminated. Its role must be evaluated under actual operating conditions.
A Context-Based Comparison of Worship-Space Priorities
The following matrix is intentionally qualitative. It illustrates the questions that should inform a project brief; it does not prescribe universal reverberation-time or intelligibility targets.
Churches
In churches, large volumes, vaulted ceilings, columns, stained glass, and reflective surfaces often create a reverberant acoustic character that enhances sacred music, congregational singing, and a sense of spiritual grandeur. Gothic cathedrals, for example, employ soaring volumes and reflective stone surfaces that generate long reverberation and a feeling of transcendence. The unique acoustic signature of churches is shaped by choral traditions such as Gregorian chant, Anglican, Orthodox, Catholic, and Gospel choirs, supported by pipe organs, pianos, or contemporary worship bands, alongside congregational hymns, psalms, worship songs, and liturgical responses.
Mosques
In mosques, domes, large prayer halls, arches, and reflective finishes often create a spacious acoustic environment while introducing challenges related to reflections and echoes. Ottoman mosques, for example, utilize domes and layered spatial geometries to enhance Quranic recitation while maintaining a sense of sacred spaciousness. The unique acoustic signature of mosques is defined by the Adhan, Quranic recitation, and collective prayer, where the beauty, warmth, and intelligibility of the human voice become central to the worship experience.
Temples
In temples, particularly those intended for chanting and meditation, timber construction, stone, plaster, and carefully sequenced spaces often create a softer and more restrained acoustic environment that supports calmness and contemplation. Traditional Buddhist temples frequently incorporate natural materials and human-scaled spaces that encourage mindful listening and spiritual focus. The unique acoustic signature of temples is shaped by chanting, temple bells, gongs, singing bowls, ritual percussion, and moments of contemplative silence that support reflection, mindfulness, and spiritual awareness.
Sacred Acoustic Design requires careful calibration of reverberation, reflections, and spatial diffusion to support the unique acoustic identity of each religious tradition without compromising speech intelligibility. The goal is not to choose between reverberance and clarity, but to achieve a balance where sacred music, chanting, and ritual sounds retain their character while sermons, teachings, scriptural readings, and spoken guidance remain clear, engaging, and spiritually meaningful through the integration of building acoustics, architectural acoustics, and electroacoustic systems.
The Five Layers of Sacred Acoustic Design
To translate worship traditions, spiritual aspirations, and architectural intentions into meaningful acoustic environments, Sacred Acoustic Design operates through five interconnected layers Together, these layers provide a human-centered framework that extends beyond conventional acoustic engineering and recognizes sound as an essential component of ritual experience, cultural identity, and spiritual atmosphere.
Figures 2. The Five Layers of Sacred Acoustic Design
1. Building Acoustics: Protecting the Sacred Acoustic Environment
The foundation of Sacred Acoustic Design begins with controlling unwanted noise. Worship, meditation, prayer, and contemplation require an environment that is protected from external distractions.
Building acoustics addresses:
Traffic and environmental noise
Aircraft and railway noise
Mechanical and HVAC systems
Vibration and structure-borne sound
Sound transmission between adjacent spaces
In sacred architecture, silence is often as important as sound. Excessive background noise can disrupt concentration, mask speech, reduce emotional engagement, and diminish spiritual experience. Building acoustics therefore establishes the conditions necessary for meaningful worship.
2. Architectural Acoustics: Shaping the Sound of Worship
Once unwanted noise is controlled, the next task is to shape how sound behaves within the worship space itself.
Architectural acoustics aligns room geometry, volume, spatial proportions, and material selection with the unique requirements of each religious tradition.
This includes:
Reverberation time
Early reflections
Sound diffusion
Echo control
Speech intelligibility
Musical support
Spatial envelopment
A Gothic cathedral, an Ottoman mosque, and a Buddhist meditation hall each require fundamentally different acoustic responses because they support different forms of worship, ritual, and collective participation. Architecture therefore becomes an active acoustic instrument rather than merely a container for sound.
3. Electroacoustics: Extending the Architectural Voice
Modern worship spaces increasingly rely on technology to support large congregations, hybrid services, livestreaming, multilingual communication, and accessibility.
Electroacoustic design includes:
Loudspeaker specification and selection
Loudspeaker placement and orientation
Coverage and uniformity analysis
Distributed audio systems
Delay speaker design
Digital signal processing
Assistive listening systems
Broadcast and streaming integration
The goal is not simply to make sound louder. Electroacoustic systems should reinforce and extend the natural acoustic character of the space, ensuring that every worshipper experiences consistent clarity, tonal balance, and engagement regardless of location.
4. Psychoacoustics: Understanding Human Perception
People do not experience reverberation time, sound pressure level, or frequency response directly. They experience spaciousness, intimacy, warmth, clarity, calmness, awe, and emotional connection.
Psychoacoustics examines how humans perceive and respond to sound, including:
Spaciousness
Envelopment
Intimacy
Emotional resonance
Perceived clarity
Acoustic comfort
Contemplative awareness
This layer recognizes that successful sacred acoustics cannot be evaluated solely through measurements. Human perception ultimately determines whether a space feels welcoming, inspiring, contemplative, or spiritually uplifting.
5. Ritual Acoustics: Supporting Worship Experience
The final layer focuses on the relationship between sound and ritual behavior.
Different worship traditions use sound in fundamentally different ways:
Sermons and scripture readings
Quranic recitation and collective prayer
Chanting and meditation
Choir performance and congregational singing
Ritual bells, drums, and ceremonial instruments
Ritual acoustics examines how sound supports worship sequences, congregation behavior, participation, and spiritual engagement. It recognizes that acoustic success is not defined solely by technical performance, but by how effectively the environment supports the intended worship experience.
From Performance Metrics to Human Experience
Together, these five layers transform acoustics from a technical discipline into a human-centered design framework. Rather than focusing exclusively on reverberation time, speech intelligibility, or loudspeaker coverage, Sacred Acoustic Design seeks to integrate building performance, architecture, technology, perception, and ritual into a unified experience.
This holistic approach allows churches, mosques, and temples to preserve their unique acoustic identities while supporting contemporary worship, community engagement, education, and digital communication. Ultimately, the goal is not merely to control sound, but to shape meaningful human experiences through sound.
Designing for the Future of Worship
Modern worship architecture is evolving rapidly. Hybrid services, immersive media, distributed audio systems, spatial sound technologies, and smart building integration are becoming increasingly common. Yet despite technological advances, the fundamental question remains unchanged:
How does a space help people feel connected to something larger than themselves? Sacred Acoustic Design proposes that the answer lies in integrating multiple dimensions of human experience: Architecture, Acoustics, Ritual, Culture, Technology, Psychology and Spiritual Wellness.
Rather than treating acoustics as a late-stage engineering consideration, it should be considered an integral component of worship experience from the earliest stages of design.
Figure 3. Sacred Acoustic Design Workflow
The Sacred Acoustic Design workflow establishes a human-centered methodology for integrating architecture, acoustics, technology, ritual behavior, and spiritual experience. However, the practical application of this framework varies significantly across different religious traditions.
To explore these differences in greater depth, readers are invited to continue with the following companion studies:
Church Acoustics: Designing for Liturgy, Choir, and Contemporary Worship
This article examines how acoustic design strategies differ among Catholic, Protestant, Evangelical, Pentecostal, and Megachurch environments. Topics include liturgical worship, congregational singing, choir performance, pipe organs, contemporary worship bands, speech intelligibility, reverberation control, and audiovisual integration.
Mosque Acoustics: Balancing Quranic Recitation, Prayer, and Modern Technology
This article explores the acoustic challenges of contemporary mosque design, including Adhan, Quranic recitation, Friday sermons, collective prayer, dome acoustics, speech intelligibility, sound system integration, and the relationship between architecture, ritual, and Islamic acoustic identity.
Temple Acoustics: Sound, Silence, and Contemplative Architecture
This article investigates how Buddhist temples and meditation halls use sound, silence, chanting, bells, gongs, singing bowls, and ritual percussion to create contemplative environments. It examines the relationship between temple architecture, psychoacoustics, ritual practice, and spiritual experience.
Together, these companion articles demonstrate how Sacred Acoustic Design can be translated into context-specific solutions that preserve the unique sonic identity of churches, mosques, and temples while supporting the evolving needs of contemporary worship, community engagement, education, and digital communication.
Sacred Acoustic Design in Practice: Selected Success Stories
While Sacred Acoustic Design is grounded in research, its true value emerges when applied to real worship environments. Each sacred space possesses its own architectural identity, ritual requirements, acoustic challenges, and cultural significance. The following projects illustrate how building acoustics, architectural acoustics, electroacoustics, psychoacoustics, and ritual acoustics can be integrated to create meaningful worship experiences.
Jakarta Cathedral: Preserving Neo-Gothic Reverberance While Improving Speech Intelligibility
One of the most rewarding challenges in sacred acoustic design is improving communication without compromising the acoustic identity that makes a historic worship space unique.
At the Jakarta Cathedral, the objective was not to reduce reverberation or transform the acoustic character of the building. As a Neo-Gothic cathedral, its soaring volumes, reflective surfaces, and vertical architectural expression contribute to a reverberant environment that supports liturgical music, organ performance, choir singing, and the sense of sacred grandeur associated with Catholic worship.
The challenge was improving speech intelligibility for sermons, scripture readings, and liturgical communication while preserving the cathedral's authentic reverberant character.
Rather than introducing additional loudspeakers, the design strategy focused on optimizing the electroacoustic system through careful loudspeaker selection, placement, coverage analysis, and signal alignment. By reducing the overall number of loudspeakers and improving system coordination, the project achieved clearer speech communication with less acoustic interference and reduced overlapping sound fields.
This approach delivered two significant benefits. First, worshippers experienced improved speech intelligibility without sacrificing the cathedral's natural reverberation and sacred atmosphere. Second, the reduction in loudspeaker quantity minimized visual clutter throughout the nave, allowing the Neo-Gothic architecture, columns, and interior details to be appreciated without the distraction of excessive audiovisual equipment.
The project demonstrated that successful sacred acoustic design is not always about adding more technology. Sometimes the most effective solution is allowing architecture and acoustics to work together more intelligently.
Jakarta Floating Mosque Ancol: Integrating Architecture, Nature, and Immersive Audio
The Jakarta Floating Mosque in Ancol presented a very different challenge. Unlike enclosed worship environments, this mosque exists within an open architectural setting that maintains a direct relationship with its surrounding coastal environment.
The architectural concept combines exposed concrete, timber elements, open-air circulation, and panoramic views toward the sea. Rather than isolating worshippers from their surroundings, the design embraces the presence of wind, water, and environmental sound as part of the spatial experience.
Conventional mosque sound systems often focus primarily on amplification and speech coverage. However, the acoustic ambition for this project extended beyond intelligibility alone.
The design implemented an immersive audio strategy that carefully integrated electroacoustic systems with the natural soundscape of the Ancol waterfront. Rather than competing with environmental sounds, the audio system was designed to complement the acoustic character of the site, allowing Quranic recitation, prayer, and spoken communication to coexist harmoniously with the subtle sounds of waves, wind, and the surrounding environment.
The result is an acoustic experience where architecture, nature, and worship become interconnected. The exposed concrete contributes a sense of permanence and monumentality, while timber surfaces introduce warmth and acoustic moderation. Together with the immersive audio system, these elements create a contemporary interpretation of sacred spaciousness that is deeply connected to place.
This project illustrates how Sacred Acoustic Design can move beyond the building envelope and incorporate environmental sound as part of the worship experience itself.
Yayasan Borobudur Medan: Supporting Multiple Traditions Within a Single Buddhist Campus
The Yayasan Borobudur Temple complex in Medan presented a unique challenge because it accommodates multiple forms of Buddhist teaching, prayer, and spiritual practice within a single development.
Rather than designing a single acoustic solution for the entire complex, the project recognized that different worship activities require different acoustic environments.
The design involved both architectural acoustics and electroacoustic systems for three distinct teaching and prayer halls, each supporting different modes of worship, instruction, and congregation behavior.
Some spaces required enhanced speech intelligibility to support Dharma teachings and educational activities. Others required greater acoustic warmth and resonance for chanting, ceremonial rituals, and collective spiritual practice. Each hall therefore received a tailored acoustic strategy based on room volume, geometry, material selection, reverberation characteristics, loudspeaker design, and congregation use patterns.
By aligning the acoustic environment with the intended ritual function of each space, the project created a more meaningful and effective worship experience across the entire campus.
The project highlights one of the central principles of Sacred Acoustic Design: there is no universal acoustic solution for worship architecture. Different traditions, rituals, and congregation behaviors require different acoustic responses. The role of the consultant is to understand these differences and translate them into environments that support both communication and spiritual experience.
Why Sacred Acoustic Design Matters
In the same way that architects carefully shape geometry, dimension, and materiality, acousticians should also shape the acoustic identity of worship spaces. Sound is not merely a technical service. It is a medium of ritual, memory, belonging, and spiritual experience. Sacred Acoustic Design seeks to ensure that churches, mosques, and temples not only look sacred, but also sound sacred.
When sacred architecture is designed well, people may not consciously analyze the geometry, the materials, or the acoustic metrics. What they remember is the feeling: the resonance of a hymn, the clarity of a recitation, the calm of a bell fading into silence, the collective breath of a congregation in prayer.
That is the deeper promise of Sacred Acoustic Design. It transforms sound from a technical concern into a medium of ritual meaning, cultural memory, and human connection. For modern churches, mosques, and temples, this is not a luxury. It is part of what makes sacred space sacred.
About the author
Herwin Gunawan is Principal Consultant of ALTA Integra and an Architectural Building Physics and Technology Consultant specializing in acoustics, lighting, audiovisual systems, passive design, smart building integration, and human-centered environmental performance. His work explores how sound, space, and ritual experience can be integrated into a coherent design practice for worship, wellness, and culturally meaningful architecture.
References
Abdou, A. A. (2003). Measurement of acoustical characteristics of mosques in Saudi Arabia. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113(3), 1505–1517.
Abdou, A. A. (2003). Comparison of mosque acoustics in different architectural forms. Building Acoustics, 10(1), 39–56.
Beranek, L. L. (1996). Concert and Opera Halls: How They Sound. New York: Acoustical Society of America.
Berardi, U., & Iannace, G. (2015). Acoustic characterization of churches: A literature review. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 16(6), 774–789.
Blesser, B., & Salter, L. R. (2007). Spaces Speak, Are You Listening? Experiencing Aural Architecture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Carvalho, A. P. O. (1999). Sound, noise and speech in Catholic churches. Proceedings of Forum Acusticum.
Desarnaulds, V. (2013). Acoustics of Performance Spaces. Lausanne: Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes.
Durkheim, É. (1912). The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Paris: Alcan.
Eliade, M. (1959). The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religion. New York: Harcourt Brace.
Everest, F. A., & Pohlmann, K. C. (2015). Master Handbook of Acoustics (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
Fastl, H., & Zwicker, E. (2007). Psychoacoustics: Facts and Models (3rd ed.). Berlin: Springer.
Iannace, G., Trematerra, A., & Berardi, U. (2013). Acoustics of places of worship: A review of the state of the art. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 7(6), 1–18.
International Organization for Standardization. (2009). ISO 3382-1: Acoustics — Measurement of Room Acoustic Parameters — Part 1: Performance Spaces. Geneva: ISO.
International Organization for Standardization. (2014). ISO 12913-1: Acoustics — Soundscape — Part 1: Definition and Conceptual Framework. Geneva: ISO.
International Organization for Standardization. (2018). ISO 12913-2: Acoustics — Soundscape — Part 2: Data Collection and Reporting Requirements. Geneva: ISO.
International Organization for Standardization. (2019). ISO 12913-3: Acoustics — Soundscape — Part 3: Data Analysis. Geneva: ISO.
Jones, L. (2000). The Hermeneutics of Sacred Architecture: Experience, Interpretation, Comparison. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Juslin, P. N., & Sloboda, J. A. (2010). Handbook of Music and Emotion: Theory, Research, Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kang, J. (2007). Urban Sound Environment. London: Taylor & Francis.
Kang, J., & Schulte-Fortkamp, B. (2016). Soundscape and the Built Environment. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Kuttruff, H. (2016). Room Acoustics (6th ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Long, M. (2014). Architectural Acoustics (2nd ed.). Burlington, MA: Academic Press.
Moore, B. C. J. (2012). An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing (6th ed.). Leiden: Brill.
Norberg-Schulz, C. (1980). Genius Loci: Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture. New York: Rizzoli.
Orfali, W. A. (2007). Acoustic performance of mosque prayer halls. Building Acoustics, 14(1), 45–62.
Pallasmaa, J. (2012). The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses (3rd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.
Rychtáriková, M. (2011). Acoustic environment and perception in Buddhist temple spaces. Building Acoustics, 18(2), 135–148.
Schafer, R. M. (1977). The Soundscape: Our Sonic Environment and the Tuning of the World. Rochester, VT: Destiny Books.
Small, C. (1998). Musicking: The Meanings of Performing and Listening. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.
Turino, T. (2008). Music as Social Life: The Politics of Participation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
